The following is a transcription of the podcast made available HERE . Welcome to the ex-Christian monologues, a podcast from the webmaster of exchristian.net. I’m Dave, the webmaster, and it’s March 26, 2006. Here’s a comment someone posted on ExChristian.Net just this morning: “May I ask you a question?” writes the poster. “How are you so sure that there is no god. I think I understand well the position of agnostics. But I am curious about your conviction of no god. Anybody tell me?” It is both frustrating and fascinating the number of times I’ve seen this question. The people asking are usually sincere, or appear sincere – they believe they are asking a pretty good question, one the requires a pretty good answer. Some people think that by simply asking that question, or some variation of it, that they’ve made a good point, or proven something. Another version of the “how can you be sure there is no god” question, would be: “what is your evidence that there is no god?” Okay, let’s con...

by Valerie T In light of this week's massacre of apparent children. Lesson II: Child-ness A good Evangelical must be able to recognize children on sight. This is because God loves children and every one is precious in his sight. He watches over them and protects them from harm, just like an all-powerful shepherd watching over his lambs. The Bible says so. Although this may not seem obvious in the world around us, when you understand the difference between a child and not-a-child everything becomes clear. You know who to take care of and how to keep from getting distracted by child-like creatures that don't merit your attention. It also becomes obvious who God wants you to vote for - politicians who prioritize children over not-children. After studying the following series of photos, you will be able to differentiate between children and not-children almost as well as God himself — though not quite, because, as the photos illustrate, God is infinitely wise and you are not. The b...

Launch in external player http://holyvirals.org | http://www.liel.net/

by Deamond ORDINARY THEIST oh, look, there's the King! AGNOSTIC Is... is he... is he wearing skin-colloured clothes or something? ATHEIST Oh, god, he's naked. SCIENTIST "Pardon us, your majesty, may we feel your sleeve for a moment?" "Why, certainly." (Whispers to coleague) "He's naked" NONPRACTICEING THEIST I'm bored, I'm going home HEATHEN your King is naked, not like our King. PHILOSOPHER Maybe the clothes are there and the King isn't. CULTIST (Streaks in front of parade, gets arrested, no one gets the irony) CREATION SCIENTIST Well, obviously you can't feel it, either. FANATIC (Actually sees clothes) LUCIFERIAN Wooo! Shake it! TELEVANGEALIST We'll send you the bill for the robes, your majesty.

By Wayne O Gen.1 [1] In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. [2] And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. [3] And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. [4] And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. [5] And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. …. [14] And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: [15] And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. [16] And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. [17] And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, [18] A...